A company is using an Amazon API Gateway REST API endpoint as a webhook to publish events from an on-premises source control management (SCM) system to Amazon EventBridge. The company has configured an EventBridge rule to listen for the events and to control application deployment in a central AWS account. The company needs to receive the same events across multiple receiver AWS accounts.
How can a developer meet these requirements without changing the configuration of the SCM system?

• A.Convert the API Gateway type from REST API to HTTP API.
• B.Grant permission to the central AWS account for EventBridge to access the receiver AWS accounts.
  Add an EventBridge event bus on the receiver AWS accounts as the targets to the existing EventBridge rule.
• C.Deploy the API Gateway REST API to all the receiver AWS accounts. Create as many SCM webhooks as the number of AWS accounts.
• D.Deploy the API Gateway REST API to all the required AWS accounts. Use the same custom domain name for all the gateway endpoints so that a single SCM webhook can be used for all events from all accounts.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A developer is creating an application for a company. The application needs to read the file doc.txt that is placed in the root folder of an Amazon S3 bucket that is named DOC-EXAMPLE- BUCKET. The company's security team requires the principle of least privilege to be applied to the application's IAM policy.
Which IAM policy statement will meet these security requirements?

• A.
• B.
• C.
• D.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A development team maintains a web application by using a single AWS CloudFormation template. The template defines web servers and an Amazon RDS database. The team uses the Cloud Formation template to deploy the Cloud Formation stack to different environments.
During a recent application deployment, a developer caused the primary development database to be dropped and recreated. The result of this incident was a loss of data. The team needs to avoid accidental database deletion in the future.
Which solutions will meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

• A.Add a CloudFormation Deletion Policy attribute with the Retain value to the database resource.
• B.Update the CloudFormation stack policy to prevent updates to the database.
• C.Modify the database to use a Multi-AZ deployment.
• D.Create a CloudFormation stack set for the web application and database deployments.
• E.Add a Cloud Formation DeletionPolicy attribute with the Retain value to the stack.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A company has an existing application that has hardcoded database credentials A developer needs to modify the existing application The application is deployed in two AWS Regions with an active-passive failover configuration to meet company's disaster recovery strategy The developer needs a solution to store the credentials outside the code. The solution must comply With the company's disaster recovery strategy Which solution Will meet these requirements in the MOST secure way?

• A.Store the credentials in AWS Secrets Manager in the primary Region. Enable secret replication to the secondary Region Update the application to use the Amazon Resource Name (ARN) based on the Region.
• B.Store credentials in AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store in the primary Region. Enable parameter replication to the secondary Region. Update the application to use the Amazon Resource Name (ARN) based on the Region.
• C.Store credentials in a config file. Upload the config file to an S3 bucket in me primary Region. Enable Cross-Region Replication (CRR) to an S3 bucket in the secondary region. Update the application to access the config file from the S3 bucket based on the Region.
• D.Store credentials in a config file. Upload the config file to an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system. Update the application to use the Amazon EFS file system Regional endpoints to access the config file in the primary and secondary Regions.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A developer supports an application that accesses data in an Amazon DynamoDB table. One of the item attributes is expirationDate in the timestamp format. The application uses this attribute to find items, archive them, and remove them from the table based on the timestamp value The application will be decommissioned soon, and the developer must find another way to implement this functionality. The developer needs a solution that will require the least amount of code to write.
Which solution will meet these requirements?

• A.Enable TTL on the expirationDate attribute in the table. Create a DynamoDB stream. Create an AWS Lambda function to process the deleted items. Create a DynamoDB trigger for the Lambda function.
• B.Create two AWS Lambda functions one to delete the items and one to process the items Create a DynamoDB stream Use the Deleteltem API operation to delete the items based on the expirationDate attribute Use the GetRecords API operation to get the items from the DynamoDB stream and process them
• C.Create two AWS Lambda functions, one to delete the items and one to process the items. Create an Amazon EventBndge scheduled rule to invoke the Lambda Functions Use the Deleteltem API operation to delete the items based on the expirationDate attribute. Use the GetRecords API operation to get the items from the DynamoDB table and process them.
• D.Enable TTL on the expirationDate attribute in the table Specify an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS> dead-letter queue as the target to delete the items Create an AWS Lambda function to process the items

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *