Free CIPS L5M1 Exam Dumps Questions & Answers

See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
When major change is introduced, employees often experience strong emotions. The Change Curve, based on Elisabeth Kubler-Ross's grief model, describes the stages staff may go through when faced with organisational change.
The first stage is Shock/Denial. The procurement assistants may initially resist the idea of e-procurement, insisting that the paper-based system "has always worked." Sayed should communicate openly about why the change is needed and provide clear facts about its benefits.
The second stage is Anger/Resistance. Staff may feel threatened, fearing loss of control or concern that they will not have the skills to manage digital systems. They may complain or openly resist. At this point, Sayed should listen empathetically, address concerns, and provide reassurance that training and support will be available.
The third stage is Exploration/Acceptance. Gradually, staff begin to see potential benefits, such as less paperwork and faster processes. Curiosity grows, and employees start experimenting with the new system. Here, Sayed should encourage participation, offer pilot training, and allow staff to test the system in a safe environment.
The fourth stage is Commitment/Integration. Once staff feel competent and confident, they fully adopt the change. At this stage, Sayed should reinforce the success, recognise achievements, and celebrate improvements, such as reduced errors or faster ordering.
How Sayed Should Act:
Communicate clearly - explain why digitalisation is important (efficiency, accuracy, competitiveness).
Provide training and support - ensure assistants feel capable of using the new e-procurement tools.
Involve the team - allow staff to give feedback on system design or pilot trials to increase buy-in.
Be empathetic and patient - acknowledge fears and provide reassurance during resistance.
Reinforce success - highlight early wins and show how the change benefits both the team and the organisation.
Conclusion:
The team is likely to experience stages of shock, anger, exploration, and eventual commitment as they move through the change curve. Sayed must act as a supportive leader by communicating openly, offering training, involving staff, and recognising progress. This approach will help the team transition smoothly to e-procurement and ensure the change is successful.

See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Part A - Three Ways a Procurement Professional Could Be Biased (15 marks):
Personal Relationships / Conflicts of Interest:
A buyer may favour a supplier due to friendship, family connection, or long-standing personal ties. For example, awarding a contract to a supplier owned by a relative, even if another supplier offers better value. This undermines fairness and can damage organisational reputation.
Preference for Incumbent Suppliers (Status Quo Bias):
Professionals may repeatedly select the same suppliers simply because they are familiar, ignoring new entrants who could provide better innovation, cost savings, or sustainability. This limits competition and supplier diversity.
Cultural or Geographical Bias:
A procurement professional may favour local suppliers over international ones, or show unconscious bias against suppliers from certain regions. While local sourcing can have benefits, excluding other suppliers without objective evaluation reduces fairness and potentially increases costs.
(Other possible biases include brand preference, ignoring SMEs, or favouring suppliers who provide personal benefits - but only three are required for full marks.) Part B - Benefits of Remaining Unbiased (10 marks):
Remaining unbiased means making supplier decisions based on objective, transparent, and fair criteria such as cost, quality, delivery performance, risk, and sustainability. The benefits include:
Fairness and Transparency: All suppliers have equal opportunity, protecting the organisation's integrity and compliance with regulations.
Best Value for Money: Objective evaluation ensures the chosen supplier offers the best mix of cost, quality, and service.
Encouraging Innovation: By considering a wider pool of suppliers, procurement can benefit from new ideas and technologies.
Ethical Compliance: Avoids corruption, fraud, or bribery, maintaining alignment with the CIPS Code of Conduct.
Reputation and Trust: Stakeholders and the market see the organisation as professional and ethical, which strengthens long-term supplier relationships.
Conclusion:
Procurement professionals may show bias through personal relationships, favouring incumbents, or cultural preferences. Remaining unbiased ensures decisions are fair, transparent, and ethical, leading to better value, innovation, and stronger supplier trust. This supports both organisational objectives and the professional standards of procurement.

See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Conflict is common in organisations and in procurement, where competing priorities, supplier issues, and internal pressures often clash. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model identifies five different approaches managers may use to handle conflict, depending on the situation and the desired outcome.
The first approach is Competing (high concern for task, low concern for people). Here the manager asserts their own position to achieve quick results, even at the expense of relationships. For example, a procurement manager may insist on enforcing compliance with tendering rules despite stakeholder resistance. This is effective in crises but can harm morale if overused.
The second is Accommodating (low concern for task, high concern for people). In this style, the manager prioritises relationships by giving way to the other party's needs. For instance, a procurement manager might accept a stakeholder's preferred supplier to maintain goodwill, even if it is not the cheapest option. This preserves harmony but risks poor business outcomes if used too often.
The third approach is Avoiding (low concern for both task and people). Here, the manager withdraws from the conflict or postpones action. This may be appropriate when the issue is minor or when emotions are high, giving time for reflection. However, in procurement, avoiding conflict with a poor-performing supplier may worsen problems over time.
The fourth is Collaborating (high concern for both task and people). This involves working with others to find win-win solutions. For example, a procurement manager may work with finance and operations to balance cost, quality, and sustainability objectives in supplier selection. This is often the most effective approach but requires time and trust.
Finally, Compromising (medium concern for task and people) involves each side giving up something to reach a middle ground. For instance, a procurement manager may agree to split supplier contracts between two stakeholders' preferences. This provides quick solutions but may leave all parties partially dissatisfied.
Conclusion:
A procurement manager can approach conflict through competing, accommodating, avoiding, collaborating, or compromising. Each has strengths and weaknesses. The best managers adapt their style depending on the importance of the issue, the urgency of the decision, and the relationships involved. In procurement, collaboration often delivers the most sustainable results, but flexibility across all five approaches is key.

See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Definition of Group Norms (10 marks):
A group 'norm' refers to the shared standards of behaviour, values, and expectations that develop within a group. Norms guide how members act and interact, creating predictability and cohesion. They can be formal (set by rules and policies) or informal (emerging naturally over time).
Examples include:
A procurement team having a norm of punctuality for meetings.
A social norm where colleagues share supplier insights openly.
A negative norm, such as tolerating late submission of purchase orders, which may undermine performance.
Norms act as unwritten rules that shape group behaviour and influence the culture of the organisation.
Impact of Group Norms on Performance (15 marks):
Positive norms can enhance performance. For example, a norm of collaboration and knowledge sharing improves innovation and decision-making in procurement projects.
Negative norms can reduce performance. If the team develops a culture of cutting corners in supplier evaluation, this may damage compliance and reputation.
Norms create consistency and cohesion. Members know what is expected of them, reducing conflict and ensuring smoother teamwork.
Peer pressure reinforces norms. High-performing norms, such as meeting deadlines, encourage all members to contribute fully, while low-performing norms, like tolerating absenteeism, can lower standards across the team.
Norms influence motivation and morale. Supportive norms (e.g., recognising achievements) motivate employees, whereas destructive norms (e.g., ignoring contributions) lead to alienation and disengagement.
In procurement specifically, if the norm is strong ethical conduct, the team will collectively avoid corruption risks. If the norm is to focus only on cost savings, the team may neglect sustainability or supplier relationships.
Conclusion:
Group norms are the unwritten rules that shape behaviour within teams. They can have a powerful effect on performance, either enhancing collaboration and accountability or reducing standards and morale. Managers must actively shape positive norms through leadership, communication, and role-modelling to ensure that group behaviour supports organisational goals.

See the Explanation for Detailed Answer
Explanation:
Definition (5 points):
Alienation at work refers to a state where employees feel disconnected, powerless, or estranged from their job, their colleagues, or the organisation. The concept, linked to Karl Marx's theory, highlights situations where workers feel that they have little control, little purpose, and no personal fulfilment in their role. Alienation often leads to low motivation, disengagement, and reduced productivity.
Five Factors that Cause Alienation (20 points):
Repetitive and monotonous work - Jobs that involve the same routine tasks every day can make employees feel like "cogs in a machine." For example, a procurement clerk only processing invoices with no involvement in decision-making may quickly feel alienated.
Lack of autonomy - When employees have no control over how they do their work, they feel powerless. In procurement, if buyers must follow rigid procedures without input into strategy, they may feel disengaged.
Poor leadership and communication - Alienation grows when managers fail to involve employees, communicate decisions, or provide feedback. Staff may feel undervalued and excluded from organisational goals.
Weak connection to organisational purpose - If employees cannot see how their work contributes to wider goals or society, they may feel their role lacks meaning. For instance, working in a cost-cutting environment without recognition of social value or sustainability can reduce motivation.
Lack of recognition or development opportunities - When employees feel their contributions are ignored, or they see no path for growth, they disengage. In procurement, failing to recognise successful negotiations or not offering training can create a sense of alienation.
Conclusion:
Alienation occurs when employees feel disconnected from their work, leading to low morale and performance. It can be caused by repetitive tasks, lack of autonomy, poor leadership, absence of purpose, and lack of recognition. For managers, reducing alienation means creating meaningful work, involving employees in decisions, and supporting development, which leads to higher engagement and productivity in procurement and supply functions.