Company XYZ is running OSPF in their network. They have merged with another company that is running EIGRP as the routing protocol. Company XYZ now needs the two domains to talk to each other with redundancy, while maintaining a loop-free environment. The solution must scale when new networks are added into the network in the near future. Which technology can be used to meet these requirements?

• A.multipoint route-redistribution with route filtering using ACLs
• B.DUMP multipoint route-redistribution with route filtering using route tags
• C.DUMPS single point route-redistribution with route filtering using route tags
• D.DUMPS single point route-redistribution with route filtering using ACLs

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Refer to the exhibit.

This network is running EIGRP as the routing protocol and the internal networks are being advertised in EIGRP. Based on the link speeds, all traffic between London and Rome is getting propagated via Barcelona and the direct link between London and Rome is not being utilized under normal working circumstances. The EIGRP design should allow for efficiency in the routing table by minimizing the routes being exchanged. The link between London and Rome should be utilized for specific routes. Which two steps accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

• A.Configure EIGRP route summarization on all the interfaces to summarize the internal LAN routes
• B.Filter the routes on the link between London and Barcelona
• C.Configure route leaking of summary routes on the link between London and Rome
• D.Filter the routes on the link between London and Rome

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Drag and drop the optical technology design characteristics on the left to the correct optical technologies on the right. Not all options are used

Correct Answer:

Explanation:
1 - target 4
2 - target 5
3 - target 1
4 - target 6
5 - target 2
6 - target 3

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

You are leading design discussions about IPv6 implementation into an existing Enterprise network A question is raised regarding older Layer 2 switches that exist in the network, and if any changes are required to these switches for successful IPv6 implementation Which two responses do you give? (Choose two.)

• A.If IPv6 multicast deployment is planned, then make sure that Layer 2 switches support MLD snooping at Layer 2 switches
• B.If IPv6 anycast deployment is planned, then make sure that Layer 2 switches support ICMPv6 snooping at Layer 2 switches
• C.IPv6 is transparent on Layer 2 switches so no changes are needed to the Layer 2 switches
• D.If IPv6 anycast deployment is planned, then make sure that Layer 2 switches support DHCPv6 snooping at Layer 2 switches
• E.If IPv6 anycast deployment is planned then make sure that Layer 2 switches support NO snooping at Layer 2 switches

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A customer has a functional requirement that states HR systems within a data center should be segmented from other systems that reside in the same data center and same VLAN. The systems run legacy applications by using hard-coded IP addresses. Which segmentation method is suitable and scalable for the customer?

• A.Data center perimeter firewalling
• B.VACLs on data center switches
• C.Transparent firewalling
• D.Routed firewalls

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *