Consider a TAS that uses a keyword-driven framework. The SUT is a web application and there is a large set of keywords available for writing the automated tests that relate to highly specific user actions linked directly to the GUI of the SUT. The automated test written with the keywords are statically analyzed by a custom tool which highlight's repeated instances of identical sequence of keywords. The waiting mechanism implemented by the TAS for a webpage load is based on a synchronous sampling within a given timeout. The TAS allowschecking a webpage load everyseconds until a timeout value

• A.Changing the wait mechanism to explicit hard-coded waits
• B.Changing the scripting approach to data-driven scripting
• C.Establishing an error recovery process for TAS and SUT
• D.Implementing keywords with a higher level of granularity

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A defect in a SUT has been resolved and validated by an automated defect re-test in the current release of the software. This retest has now been added to the automated regression test suite.
Which statement BEST describes a reason why this defect could re-occur in future releases?

• A.Theconfiguration management process does not properly control the synchronization between software archives
• B.Automated defect confirmation testing is not effective at confirming that the resolved defect will continue to work in future releases
• C.The automated regression test suite is not run consistently for future releases.
• D.The automated regression test suite has a narrower scope of functionality

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Consider a SUT that small run on multiple platform during the execution of automated test runs. In each test run an automated test suite needs to be executed, with the same version of the TAF, against the sameversion of the SUT of each platform. Each platform shall have its own dedicated test environment. Your goal is to implement a process as automated as possible ( i.e with minimal manual intervention) that allows implementing a consistent setup of the TAS across the multiple test environments.
Which two of the following aspects are MOST relevant for achieving your goal in this scenario?
* The configuration of the TAS uses automated installation scripts
* The TAF saves the logs needed to debug errors in XML format
C) Features of the TAF not used by the automated tests have been tested D) All the automated test cases contain the expected results E) The TAS components are under configuration management

• A.B and d
• B.A and d
• C.A and e
• D.B and c

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Which of the following attributes should NOT be included in a test execution report associated with a suite of automated tests?

• A.Environment in which the tests have been executed
• B.Defect clusters identified during test execution
• C.Summary of the test execution results
• D.System/Application under test and its version

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Which of the following metrics could suggest, under certain condition that an automated regression test suite has NOT been updated for new functionalities added to the SUT?

• A.The defect density in the automation code of the regression test suite.
• B.The ratio of commands to executable statements in the automation code of the regression test suite
• C.The ratio of comments to executable statements in the SUT code.
• D.The SUT code coverage provided by the execution of the regression test suite.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *