Free Juniper JN0-692 Exam Dumps Questions & Answers
| Exam Code/Number: | JN0-692Join the discussion |
| Exam Name: | Service Provider Routing and Switching Support, Professional |
| Certification: | Juniper |
| Free Question Number: | 60 |
| Publish Date: | Jul 21, 2026 |
| # of views: | 1862 |
|
|
|
You are monitoring the control plane traffic using a network analyzer on an Ethernet network segment with all routers configured with IS-IS routing. Which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
Click the Exhibit button.
user@router> show route 100.1.1.0
inet.0: 17 destinations, 19 routes (16 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
100.1.1.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:08:51, localpref 100
AS path: 65000 I
to 17.3.1.4 via xe-5/2/0.0
> to 17.1.1.1 via xe-5/2/1.0
[BGP/170] 00:08:51, localpref 100
AS path: 65000 I
> to 17.3.1.4 via xe-5/2/0.0
Referring to the exhibit, which configuration was used to load-balance traffic across xe-5/2/0 and xe-5/2/1 interfaces?
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit --
[edit]
user@router# show protocols bgp
group ebgp {
import block-martian;
family inet {
unicast;
}
peer-as 65530;
neighbor 172.22.135.37;
}
[edit]
user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement block-martian {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 0.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject;
route-filter 127.0.0.0/8 orlonger reject;
route-filter 191.255.0.0/16 orlonger reject;
route-filter 192.0.0.0/24 orlonger reject;
route-filter 223.255.255.0/24 orlonger reject;
route-filter 240.0.0.0/4 orlonger reject;
}
}
then reject;
}
[edit]
You have established a peering with an EBGP neighbor, but the peer's 172.0.0.0/8 routes show as hidden.
Referring to the exhibit, what is causing the problem?
You have configured an MPLS LSP but it will not establish because of a failed CSPF computation. What are two reasons for this happening? (Choose two.)
