Free SAP C-DBADM-2601 Exam Dumps Questions & Answers

CHALLENGE 1 - Post-Upgrade Configuration Consistency Review
The database owner wants to close a configuration item because users can access reports successfully. The administration record does not yet show whether a post-upgrade value is intentionally retained or left over from upgrade preparation. Which action best supports a controlled hypercare decision?

• A.Move the value review to the future cloud transition because the current database is on-premises.
• B.Replace the value with the cloud setting to simplify administration across the mixed landscape.
• C.Close the item because user access confirms that the database is ready for business reporting.
• D.Compare the active post-upgrade value with the intended administration baseline before closure.

CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
The cutover coordinator wants to use the first comparison because carrier exception reports opened successfully. The database team later confirms that the upgraded distribution system's administration record does not reflect the configuration state used during testing. Which decision best supports release-quality evidence?

• A.Treat the missing configuration evidence as unrelated because cutover testing focuses on reporting access.
• B.Use the comparison because report opening is sufficient evidence for release support.
• C.Replace the upgraded system record with the SAP HANA Cloud provisioning record.
• D.Update the administration record and reassess the cutover comparison against the confirmed state.

A regional home improvement retailer uses SAP HANA for replenishment analytics in an on-premises administration environment. After a scheduled start, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available. During post-start validation, the administrator sees that a configuration parameter change is visible in the approved change record, but the active administration check still reports the old parameter value. Reports continue to run, and the service owner wants to close the maintenance window.
The constraint is that the administrator must verify the active configuration state before closure. The team must not accept the change record as sufficient evidence when the system artifact still shows the previous value.
What should the administrator do next?

• A.Close the maintenance window because database availability and running reports prove that the change did not disrupt operations.
• B.Update the change record with an additional note confirming that reports continue to run after startup.
• C.Apply or activate the approved parameter change in the active administration context, then validate that the runtime check shows the approved value.
• D.Restart the database again so the approved change record is automatically synchronized with the runtime check.

A regional insurance claims processor runs SAP HANA for daily operational reporting. After a scheduled workload increase, SAP HANA cockpit shows higher memory usage and slower report response times. The alert list shows a threshold warning, but the operations note only records that reports are "slow." A support analyst proposes increasing the threshold so the warning no longer appears.
The constraint is that the administrator must determine whether the warning represents a real workload pattern requiring follow-up or only an alert configuration mismatch. The response must preserve monitoring usefulness for future workload changes.
Which action best addresses the monitoring issue?

• A.Correlate the alert timing with workload and memory behavior, update the monitoring evidence, and adjust thresholds only if the observed baseline supports it.
• B.Disable the alert temporarily so operational reports can continue without monitoring noise.
• C.Restart the database so memory usage returns to normal before the next reporting cycle.
• D.Increase the alert threshold immediately because users already reported slow response times.

A media analytics provider is documenting the administration model for SAP HANA across an on-premises system and an SAP HANA Cloud environment. During validation, an administrator records that monitoring, backup review, and database explorer checks are being performed from different tools without a clear statement of which environment each evidence item represents. The cloud instance is available, and the on-premises system is also active for the current reporting workload.
The constraint is that the administration handover must distinguish environment-specific evidence before operational ownership changes. The team must avoid accepting mixed proof that combines cloud availability with on-premises operational checks.
Which action best supports a reliable handover?

• A.Delay all validation until the on-premises workload is migrated so only one environment remains active.
• B.Combine all successful checks into one operations summary because both environments belong to the SAP HANA landscape.
• C.Use the cloud availability status as the primary handover evidence because the modernization target is available.
• D.Create a validation record that maps each tool output to the specific SAP HANA environment before accepting the handover.