Free Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam Dumps Questions & Answers

A retail company is implementing a MuleSoft API to get inventory details from two vendors by Invoking each vendor's online applications. Due to network issues, the invocations to the vendor applications are timing out intermittently, but the requests are successful after re-invoking each vendor application.
What is the most performant way of implementing the API to invoke each vendor application and to retry invocations that generate timeout errors?

• A.Use a Scatter-Gather scope to invoke each vendor application on a separate route.Use an Until- Successful scope in each route to retry requests that raise timeout errors.
• B.Use a Round-Robin scope to invoke each vendor application on a separate route.Use a Try-Catch scope in each route to retry requests that raise timeout errors.
• C.Use a For-Each scope to invoke the two vendor applications in series, one after the other.Place the For- Each scope inside an Until-Successful scope to retry requests that raise timeout errors.
• D.Use a Choice scope to Invoke each vendor application on a separate route.Place the Choice scope inside an Until-Successful scope to retry requests that raisetimeout errors.

An organization has defined a common object model in Java to mediate the communication between different Mule applications in a consistent way. A Mule application is being built to use this common object model to process responses from a SOAP API and a REST API and then write the processed results to an order management system.
The developers want Anypoint Studio to utilize these common objects to assist in creating mappings for various transformation steps in the Mule application.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) and performant way to utilize these common objects to map between the inbound and outbound systems in the Mule application?

• A.Use the Transform Message component
• B.Use JAXB (XML) and Jackson (JSON) data bindings
• C.Use the WSS module
• D.Use the Java module

An Order microservice and a Fulfillment microservice are being designed to communicate with their dients through message-based integration (and NOT through API invocations).
The Order microservice publishes an Order message (a kind of command message) containing the details of an order to be fulfilled. The intention is that Order messages are only consumed by one Mute application, the Fulfillment microservice.
The Fulfilment microservice consumes Order messages, fulfills the order described therein, and then publishes an OrderFulfilted message (a kind of event message). Each OrderFulfilted message can be consumed by any interested Mule application, and the Order microservice is one such Mute application.
What is the most appropriate choice of message broker(s) and message destination(s) in this scenario?

• A.Order messages are sent to a JMS queue. OrderFulfilled messages are sent to a JMS topic The Order microservice interacts with one JMS provider (message broker) and the Fulfillment microservice interacts with a different JMS provider, so that both message brokers can be chosen and scaled to best support the load of each microservice
• B.Order messages are sent to an Anypoint MQ exchange OrderFulfilled messages are sent to an Anypoint MQ queue Both microservices interact with Anypoint MQ as the message broker, which must therefore scale to support the load of both microservices
• C.Order messages are sent directly to the Fulfillment microservices. OrderFulfilled messages are sent directly to the Order microservice The Order microservice interacts with one AMQP-compatible message broker and the Fulfillment microservice interacts with a different AMQP-compatible message broker, so that both message brokers can be chosen and scaled to best support the load of each microservice
• D.Order messages are sent to a JMS queue. OrderFulfilled messages are sent to a JMS topic Both microservices interact with the same JMS provider (message broker) instance, which must therefore scale to support the load of both microservices

Which type of communication is managed by a service mesh in a microservices architecture?

• A.Communication between microservices developers
• B.Communication between trading partner services
• C.Communication between microservices
• D.Communication between microservices runtime administrators

How should the developer update the logging configuration in order to enable this package specific debugging?

• A.In the Mule application's log4j2.xml file, add an AsyncLogger element with name property set to org.
  apache.cxf and level set to DEBUG, then redeploy the Mule application in the CloudHub production environment
• B.In Anypoint Runtime Manager, in the Deployed Application Properties tab for the Mule application, add a line item with DEBUG level for package org.apache.cxf and apply the changes
• C.In the Mule application's log4j2.xmI file, change the root logger's level property to DEBUG, then redeploy the Mule application to the CloudHub production environment
• D.In Anypoint Monitoring, define a logging search query with class property set to org.apache.cxf and level set to DEBUG