A Mule application uses APIkit for SOAP to implement a SOAP web service. The Mule application has been deployed to a CloudHub worker in a testing environment.
The integration testing team wants to use a SOAP client to perform Integration testing. To carry out the integration tests, the integration team must obtain the interface definition for the SOAP web service.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) way for the integration testing team to obtain the interface definition for the deployed SOAP web service in order to perform integration testing with the SOAP client?

• A.Retrieve the RAML file(s) from the deployed Mule application
• B.Retrieve the WSDL file(s) from the deployed Mule application
• C.Retrieve the OpenAPI Specification file(s) from API Manager
• D.Retrieve the XML file(s) from Runtime Manager

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A new Mule application under development must implement extensive data transformation logic. Some of the data transformation functionality is already available as external transformation services that are mature and widely used across the organization; the rest is highly specific to the new Mule application.
The organization follows a rigorous testing approach, where every service and application must be extensively acceptance tested before it is allowed to go into production.
What is the best way to implement the data transformation logic for this new Mule application while minimizing the overall testing effort?

• A.Implement and expose all transformation logic as mlaoservices using DataWeave, so it can be reused by any application component that needs it, including the new Mule application
• B.Implement transformation logic in the new Mute application using DataWeave, replicating the transformation logic of existing transformation services
• C.Extend the existing transformation services with new transformation logic and Invoke them from the new Mule application
• D.Implement transformation logic in the new Mute application using DataWeave, invoking existing transformation services when possible

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Refer to the exhibit.

A Mule 4 application has a parent flow that breaks up a JSON array payload into 200 separate items, then sends each item one at a time inside an Async scope to a VM queue.
A second flow to process orders has a VM Listener on the same VM queue. The rest of this flow processes each received item by writing the item to a database.
This Mule application is deployed to four CloudHub workers with persistent queues enabled.
What message processing guarantees are provided by the VM queue and the CloudHub workers, and how are VM messages routed among the CloudHub workers for each invocation of the parent flow under normal operating conditions where all the CloudHub workers remain online?

• A.EACH item VM message is processed AT MOST ONCE by ONE CloudHub worker, with workers chosen in a deterministic round-robin fashion Each of the four CloudHub workers can be expected to process 1/4 of the Item VM messages (about 50 items)
• B.EACH item VM message is processed AT LEAST ONCE by ONE ARBITRARY CloudHub worker Each of the four CloudHub workers can be expected to process some item VM messages
• C.ALL Item VM messages are processed AT LEAST ONCE by the SAME CloudHub worker where the parent flow was invoked This one CloudHub worker processes ALL 200 item VM messages
• D.ALL item VM messages are processed AT MOST ONCE by ONE ARBITRARY CloudHub worker This one CloudHub worker processes ALL 200 item VM messages

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

An application deployed to a runtime fabric environment with two cluster replicas is designed to periodically trigger of flow for processing a high-volume set of records from the source system and synchronize with the SaaS system using the Batch job scope After processing 1000 records in a periodic synchronization of 1 lakh records, the replicas in which batch job instance was started went down due to unexpected failure in the runtime fabric environment What is the consequence of losing the replicas that run the Batch job instance?

• A.The remaining 99000 records will be lost and left and processed
• B.The second replicas will take over processing the remaining
  99000 records
• C.A new replacement replica will be available and will be process all 1,00,000 records from scratch leading to duplicate record processing
• D.A new placement replica will be available and will take or processing the remaining 99,000 records

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which cloud computing deployment model describes a composition of two or more distinct clouds that support data and application portability?

• A.Hybrid cloud 4
• B.Private cloud
• C.Community cloud
• D.Public cloud

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *