Instant Access Amazon.AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty.v2026-04-30.q178 Actual Practice Test Engine for Free (Page 21)

Question 96

A telecommunications company is developing a mobile app for its customers. The company is using an Amazon SageMaker hosted endpoint for machine learning model inferences.
Developers want to introduce a new version of the model for a limited number of users who subscribed to a preview feature of the app. After the new version of the model is tested as a preview, developers will evaluate its accuracy. If a new version of the model has better accuracy, developers need to be able to gradually release the new version for all users over a fixed period of time.
How can the company implement the testing model with the LEAST amount of operational overhead?

A.Update the ProductionVariant data type with the new version of the model by using the CreateEndpointConfig operation with the InitialVariantWeight parameter set to 0. Specify the TargetVariant parameter for InvokeEndpoint calls for users who subscribed to the preview feature. When the new version of the model is ready for release, gradually increase InitialVariantWeight until all users have the updated version.
B.Configure two SageMaker hosted endpoints that serve the different versions of the model. Create an Application Load Balancer (ALB) to route traffic to both endpoints based on the TargetVariant query string parameter. Reconfigure the app to send the TargetVariant query string parameter for users who subscribed to the preview feature. When the new version of the model is ready for release, change the ALB's routing algorithm to weighted until all users have the updated version.
C.Update the DesiredWeightsAndCapacity data type with the new version of the model by using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities operation with the DesiredWeight parameter set to 0. Specify the TargetVariant parameter for InvokeEndpoint calls for users who subscribed to the preview feature. When the new version of the model is ready for release, gradually increase DesiredWeight until all users have the updated version.
D.Configure two SageMaker hosted endpoints that serve the different versions of the model. Create an Amazon Route 53 record that is configured with a simple routing policy and that points to the current version of the model. Configure the mobile app to use the endpoint URL for users who subscribed to the preview feature and to use the Route 53 record for other users. When the new version of the model is ready for release, add a new model version endpoint to Route 53, and switch the policy to weighted until all users have the updated version.

Correct Answer: C

The best solution for implementing the testing model with the least amount of operational overhead is to use the following steps:
Update the DesiredWeightsAndCapacity data type with the new version of the model by using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities operation with the DesiredWeight parameter set to 0. This operation allows the developers to update the variant weights and capacities of an existing SageMaker endpoint without deleting and recreating the endpoint. Setting the DesiredWeight parameter to 0 means that the new version of the model will not receive any traffic initially1 Specify the TargetVariant parameter for InvokeEndpoint calls for users who subscribed to the preview feature. This parameter allows the developers to override the variant weights and direct a request to a specific variant. This way, the developers can test the new version of the model for a limited number of users who opted in for the preview feature2 When the new version of the model is ready for release, gradually increase DesiredWeight until all users have the updated version. This operation allows the developers to perform a gradual rollout of the new version of the model and monitor its performance and accuracy. The developers can adjust the variant weights and capacities as needed until the new version of the model serves all the traffic1 The other options are incorrect because they either require more operational overhead or do not support the desired use cases. For example:
Option A uses the CreateEndpointConfig operation with the InitialVariantWeight parameter set to 0. This operation creates a new endpoint configuration, which requires deleting and recreating the endpoint to apply the changes. This adds extra overhead and downtime for the endpoint. It also does not support the gradual rollout of the new version of the model3 Option B uses two SageMaker hosted endpoints that serve the different versions of the model and an Application Load Balancer (ALB) to route traffic to both endpoints based on the TargetVariant query string parameter. This option requires creating and managing additional resources and services, such as the second endpoint and the ALB. It also requires changing the app code to send the query string parameter for the preview feature4 Option D uses the access key and secret key of the IAM user with appropriate KMS and ECR permissions. This is not a secure way to pass credentials to the Processing job. It also requires the ML specialist to manage the IAM user and the keys.
References:
1: UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities - Amazon SageMaker
2: InvokeEndpoint - Amazon SageMaker
3: CreateEndpointConfig - Amazon SageMaker
4: Application Load Balancer - Elastic Load Balancing

Question 97

A Machine Learning Specialist is required to build a supervised image-recognition model to identify a cat.
The ML Specialist performs some tests and records the following results for a neural network-based image classifier:
Total number of images available = 1,000 Test set images = 100 (constant test set) The ML Specialist notices that, in over 75% of the misclassified images, the cats were held upside down by their owners.
Which techniques can be used by the ML Specialist to improve this specific test error?

A.Increase the training data by adding variation in rotation for training images.
B.Increase the number of epochs for model training.
C.Increase the number of layers for the neural network.
D.Increase the dropout rate for the second-to-last layer.

Question 98

A company wants to conduct targeted marketing to sell solar panels to homeowners. The company wants to use machine learning (ML) technologies to identify which houses already have solar panels. The company has collected 8,000 satellite images as training data and will use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to label the data.
The company has a small internal team that is working on the project. The internal team has no ML expertise and no ML experience.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST amount of effort from the internal team?

A.Set up a private workforce that consists of the internal team. Use the private workforce and the SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature to label the data. Use Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels for model training and hosting.
B.Set up a private workforce that consists of the internal team. Use the private workforce to label the data.
Use Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels for model training and hosting.
C.Set up a private workforce that consists of the internal team. Use the private workforce and the SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature to label the data. Use the SageMaker Object Detection algorithm to train a model. Use SageMaker batch transform for inference.
D.Set up a public workforce. Use the public workforce to label the data. Use the SageMaker Object Detection algorithm to train a model. Use SageMaker batch transform for inference.

Correct Answer: A

Explanation
The solution A will meet the requirements with the least amount of effort from the internal team because it uses Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth and Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels, which are fully managed services that can provide the desired functionality. The solution A involves the following steps:
Set up a private workforce that consists of the internal team. Use the private workforce and the SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature to label the data. Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth is a service that can create high-quality training datasets for machine learning by using human labelers. A private workforce is a group of labelers that the company can manage and control. The internal team can use the private workforce to label the satellite images as having solar panels or not. The SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature can reduce the labeling effort by using a machine learning model to automatically label the easy examples and only send the difficult ones to the human labelers1.
Use Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels for model training and hosting. Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels is a service that can train and deploy custom machine learning models for image analysis.
Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels can use the labeled data from SageMaker Ground Truth to train a model that can detect solar panels in satellite images. Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels can also host the model and provide an API endpoint for inference2.
The other options are not suitable because:
Option B: Setting up a private workforce that consists of the internal team, using the private workforce to label the data, and using Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels for model training and hosting will incur more effort from the internal team than using SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature. The internal team will have to label all the images manually, without the assistance of the machine learning model that can automate some of the labeling tasks1.
Option C: Setting up a private workforce that consists of the internal team, using the private workforce and the SageMaker Ground Truth active learning feature to label the data, using the SageMaker Object Detection algorithm to train a model, and using SageMaker batch transform for inference will incur more operational overhead than using Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels. The company will have to manage the SageMaker training job, the model artifact, and the batch transform job. Moreover, SageMaker batch transform is not suitable for real-time inference, as it processes the data in batches and stores the results in Amazon S33.
Option D: Setting up a public workforce, using the public workforce to label the data, using the SageMaker Object Detection algorithm to train a model, and using SageMaker batch transform for inference will incur more operational overhead and cost than using a private workforce and Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels. A public workforce is a group of labelers from Amazon Mechanical Turk, a crowdsourcing marketplace. The company will have to pay the public workforce for each labeling task, and it may not have full control over the quality and security of the labeled data. The company will also have to manage the SageMaker training job, the model artifact, and the batch transform job, as explained in option C4.
References:
1: Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth
2: Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels
3: Amazon SageMaker Object Detection
4: Amazon Mechanical Turk

Question 99

A Machine Learning Specialist is packaging a custom ResNet model into a Docker container so the company can leverage Amazon SageMaker for training. The Specialist is using Amazon EC2 P3 instances to train the model and needs to properly configure the Docker container to leverage the NVIDIA GPUs.
What does the Specialist need to do?

A.Build the Docker container to be NVIDIA-Docker compatible.
B.Bundle the NVIDIA drivers with the Docker image.
C.Organize the Docker container's file structure to execute on GPU instances.
D.Set the GPU flag in the Amazon SageMaker CreateTrainingJob request body

Question 100

A company wants to segment a large group of customers into subgroups based on shared characteristics. The company's data scientist is planning to use the Amazon SageMaker built-in k-means clustering algorithm for this task. The data scientist needs to determine the optimal number of subgroups (k) to use.
Which data visualization approach will MOST accurately determine the optimal value of k?

A.Calculate the principal component analysis (PCA) components. Run the k-means clustering algorithm for a range of k by using only the first two PCA components. For each value of k, create a scatter plot with a different color for each cluster. The optimal value of k is the value where the clusters start to look reasonably separated.
B.Calculate the principal component analysis (PCA) components. Create a line plot of the number of components against the explained variance. The optimal value of k is the number of PCA components after which the curve starts decreasing in a linear fashion.
C.Create a t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot for a range of perplexity values. The optimal value of k is the value of perplexity, where the clusters start to look reasonably separated.
D.Run the k-means clustering algorithm for a range of k. For each value of k, calculate the sum of squared errors (SSE). Plot a line chart of the SSE for each value of k. The optimal value of k is the point after which the curve starts decreasing in a linear fashion.

Correct Answer: D

The solution D is the best data visualization approach to determine the optimal value of k for the k-means clustering algorithm. The solution D involves the following steps:
* Run the k-means clustering algorithm for a range of k. For each value of k, calculate the sum of squared errors (SSE). The SSE is a measure of how well the clusters fit the data. It is calculated by summing the squared distances of each data point to its closest cluster center. A lower SSE indicates a better fit, but it will always decrease as the number of clusters increases. Therefore, the goal is to find the smallest value of k that still has a low SSE1.
* Plot a line chart of the SSE for each value of k. The line chart will show how the SSE changes as the value of k increases. Typically, the line chart will have a shape of an elbow, where the SSE drops rapidly at first and then levels off. The optimal value of k is the point after which the curve starts decreasing in a linear fashion. This point is also known as the elbow point, and it represents the balance between the number of clusters and the SSE1.
The other options are not suitable because:
* Option A: Calculating the principal component analysis (PCA) components, running the k-means clustering algorithm for a range of k by using only the first two PCA components, and creating a scatter plot with a different color for each cluster will not accurately determine the optimal value of k. PCA is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the data by transforming it into a new set of features that capture the most variance in the data. However, PCA may not preserve the original structure and distances of the data, and it may lose some information in the process. Therefore, running the k-means clustering algorithm on the PCA components may not reflect the true clusters in the data. Moreover, using only the first two PCA components may not capture enough variance to represent the data well. Furthermore, creating a scatter plot may not be reliable, as it depends on the subjective judgment of the data scientist to decide when the clusters look reasonably separated2.
* Option B: Calculating the PCA components and creating a line plot of the number of components against the explained variance will not determine the optimal value of k. This approach is used to determine the optimal number of PCA components to use for dimensionality reduction, not for clustering. The explained variance is the ratio of the variance of each PCA component to the total variance of the data. The optimal number of PCA components is the point where adding more components does not significantly increase the explained variance. However, this number may not correspond to the optimal number of clusters, as PCA and k-means clustering have different objectives and assumptions2.
* Option C: Creating a t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot for a range of perplexity values will not determine the optimal value of k. t-SNE is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the data by embedding it into a lower-dimensional space, such as a two-dimensional plane. t-SNE preserves the local structure and distances of the data, and it can reveal clusters and patterns in the data.
However, t-SNE does not assign labels or centroids to the clusters, and it does not provide a measure of how well the clusters fit the data. Therefore, t-SNE cannot determine the optimal number of clusters, as it only visualizes the data. Moreover, t-SNE depends on the perplexity parameter, which is a measure of how many neighbors each point considers. The perplexity parameter can affect the shape and size of the clusters, and there is no optimal value for it. Therefore, creating a t-SNE plot for a range of perplexity values may not be consistent or reliable3.
References:
* 1: How to Determine the Optimal K for K-Means?
* 2: Principal Component Analysis
* 3: t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding

Question 96

Question 97

Question 98

Question 99

Question 100

Download PDF File