Question 61
An LTM device has a virtual server configured as a Performance Layer 4 virtual listening on
0.0.0.0:0 to perform routing of packets to an upstream router. The client machine at IP address
192.168.0.4 is attempting to contact a host upstream of the LTM device on IP address 10.0.0.99.
The network flow is asymmetrical, and the following TCP capture displays:
# tcpdump -nnni 0.0 'host 192.168.0.4 and host 10.0.0.99' tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
05:07:55.499954 IP 192.168.0.4.35345 > 10.0.0.99.443: S 3205656213:3205656213(0) ack
3267995082 win 1480 05:07:55.499983 IP 10.0.0.99.443 > 192.168.0.4.35345: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0 05:07:56.499960 IP 192.168.0.4.35345 > 10.0.0.99.443: S 3205656213:3205656213(0) ack
3267995082 win 1480 05:07:56.499990 IP 10.0.0.99.443 > 192.168.0.4.35345: R 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0 4 packets captured
Which option within the fastL4 profile needs to be enabled by the LTM Specialist to prevent the LTM device from rejecting the flow?
Question 62
An HTTP 1.1 application utilizes chunking.
Which header should be used to notify the client's browser that there are additional HTTP headers at the end of the message?
Question 63
A virtual server for a set of web services is constructed on an LTM device. The LTM Specialist has created an iRule and applied this iRule to the virtual server:
when HTTP_REQUEST {
switch [HTTP::uri] {
"/WS1/ws.jsp" {
log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to JSP Pool"
pool JSP
}
default { log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool"
pool NonJSP
}
}
}
However, the iRule is NOT behaving as expected. Below is a snapshot of the log:
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
/ws1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/ws1/ws.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
What is the problem?
Question 64
An LTM Specialist is receiving reports from customers about multiple applications failing to work properly.
The LTM Specialist looks at the services running and notices that the bigd process has NOT started.
How are monitored LTM device objects marked when the bigd process is stopped?
Question 65
Given LTM device ltm log:
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice promptstatusd[3695]: 01460006:5: semaphore mcpd.running(1) held Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice promptstatusd[3695]: 01460006:5:
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 warning promptstatusd[3695]: 01460005:4: mcpd.running(1) held, wait for mcpd
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info sod[3925]: 010c0009:6: Lost connection to mcpd - reestablishing.
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0004:3: Lost connection with MCP: 16908291 ...
Exiting bsx_connect.cpp(174)
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0012:6: MCP Exit Status Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0012:6: Info: LACP stats (time now:1348717868) :
no traffic
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 info bcm56xxd[3847]: 012c0014:6: Exiting...
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err lind[3842]: 013c0004:3: IO error on recv from mcpd - connection lost Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 notice bigd[3837]: 01060110:5: Lost connection to mcpd with error 16908291, will reinit connection.
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err statsd[3857]: 011b0004:3: Initial subscription for system configuration failed with error ''
Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err statsd[3857]: 011b0001:3: Connection to mcpd failed with error
'011b0004:3: Initial subscription for system configuration failed with error ''' Sep 26 20:51:08 local/lb-d-1 err csyncd[3851]: 013b0004:3: IO error on recv from mcpd - connection lost
.............skipping more logs.....
Sep 26 20:51:30 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 01140030:5: HA proc_running bcm56xxd is now responding.
Sep 26 20:51:34 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 01140030:5: HA proc_running mcpd is now responding.
Sep 26 20:51:34 local/lb-d-1 notice sod[3925]: 010c0018:5: Standby
Which daemon failed?