Given the iRule:
when HTTP_REQUEST {
if {([HTTP::username] ne "") and ([HTTP::password] ne "") } {
log local0. "client ip [IP::remote_addr] credentials provided [HTTP::username] [HTTP::password]"}
else {
pool old_application_pool
}
}
The associated virtual server has a default pool named new_application_pool.
Which functionality does the iRule provide?

• A.Allows clients with credentials to access the old_application_pool and logs the attempted access of clients with credentials to the new_application_pool.
• B.Allows clients without credentials to access the old_application_pool and logs the attempted access of clients without credentials to the new_application_pool.
• C.Allows clients with credentials to access the old_application_pool and logs the access of clients without credentials to the new_application_pool.
• D.Allows clients without credentials to access the old_application_pool and logs the access of clients with credentials to the new_application_pool.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A failover event is recorded in the following log messages:
Jan 01 00:56:56 BIG-IP notice mcpd[5318]: 01070727:5: Pool /Common/my-pool member / Common/10.0.0.10:80 monitor status down.
Jan 01 00:56:56 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0045:5: Leaving active, group score 10 peer group score
20.
Jan 01 00:56:56 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0052:5: Standby for traffic group /Common/traffic-group-1.
Jan 01 00:56:56 BIG-IP notice sod[5855]: 010c0018:5: Standby
Jan 01 00:57:06 BIG-IP notice logger: /usr/bin/tmipsecd --tmmcount 4 ==> /usr/bin/bigstart stop racoon What is the cause of the failover?

• A.The racoon service stopped responding.
• B.The HA group score changed.
• C.The peer device left the traffic group.
• D.No traffic is seen on traffic-group-1.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM Specialist is investigating reports that users are unable to perform some commands through an FTP virtual server. The LTM Specialist performs a capture on the server side of the LTM device.
What is the issue with the application?

• A.data connection failing
• B.PORT command disallowed
• C.LIST command disallowed
• D.command connection failing

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

An LTM Specialist has been asked to configure a virtual server to distribute connections between a pool of two application servers with addresses 172.16.20.1 and 172.16.20.2. The application servers are listening on TCP ports 80 and 443. The application administrators have asked that clients be directed to the same node for both HTTP and HTTPS requests within the same session.
Virtual servers vs_http and vs_https have been created, listening on 1.2.3.100:80 and 1.2.3.100:443, respectively.
Which configuration option will result in the desired behavior?

• A.Create pool app_pool with members 172.16.20.1:any and 172.16.20.2:any Assign app_pool as the default pool for both vs_http and vs_https Disable port translation for vs_http and vs_https
• B.Create pool http_pool with members 172.16.20.1:80 and 172.16.20.2:80 Create pool https_pool with members 172.16.20.1:443 and 172.16.20.2:443 Assign http_pool as the default pool for vs_http Assign https_pool as the default pool for vs_https Create a source address persistence profile with "match across services" enabled Assign the persistence profile to vs_http and vs_https
• C.Create pool http_pool with members 172.16.20.1:80 and 172.16.20.2:80 Assign pool http_pool as the default pool for both vs_https and vs_https Disable port translation for vs_https Create an SSL persistence profile with "match across virtual servers" enabled Assign the persistence profile to vs_http.
• D.Create pool http_pool with members 172.16.20.1:80 and 172.16.20.2:80 Create pool https_pool with members 172.16.20.1:443 and 172.16.20.2:443 Assign http_pool as the default pool for vs_http Assign https_pool as the default pool for vs_https Create an SSL persistence profile with "match across virtual servers" enabled Assign the persistence profile to vs_http

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

There are three servers in the pool: 172.16.20.1, 172.16.20.2, and 172.16.20.3, with the virtual IP address
10.0.20.88.
A user CANNOT connect to an HTTP application. To understand the problem and find a solution, the LTM Specialist runs two concurrent traces on the LTM device, with the following results:
Trace on client side:
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on 0.0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
22:22:07.423759 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 10.0.20.88.80: S 998346084:998346084(0) win 5840 <mss
1460,sackOK,timestamp 67942058 0,nop,wscale 4>
22:22:07.424056 IP 10.0.20.88.80 > 172.16.20.100.53875: S 4671780:4671780(0) ack 998346085 win
4380 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 2392362490 67942058,sackOK,eol>
22:22:07.424776 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 10.0.20.88.80: . ack 1 win 365 <nop,nop,timestamp 67942058
2392362490>
22:22:07.424790 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 10.0.20.88.80: P 1:149(148) ack 1 win 365
<nop,nop,timestamp 67942058 2392362490>
22:22:07.424891 IP 10.0.20.88.80 > 172.16.20.100.53875: . ack 149 win 4528 <nop,nop,timestamp
2392362491 67942058>
22:22:12.024850 IP 10.0.20.88.80 > 172.16.20.100.53875: R 1:1(0) ack 149 win 4528
6 packets captured
6 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
Trace on server side:
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on internal, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
22:22:07.424881 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 172.16.20.2.80: S 51116678:51116678(0) win 4380 <mss
1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 2392362491 0,sackOK,eol>
22:22:08.424893 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 172.16.20.2.80: S 51116678:51116678(0) win 4380 <mss
1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 2392363491 0,sackOK,eol>
22:22:09.625082 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 172.16.20.2.80: S 51116678:51116678(0) win 4380 <mss
1460,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 2392364691 0,sackOK,eol>
22:22:10.825194 IP 172.16.20.100.53875 > 172.16.20.2.80: S 51116678:51116678(0) win 4380 <mss
1460,sackOK,eol>
4 packets captured
4 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
What should the LTM Specialist do to solve the problem?

• A.Enable the virtual server.
• B.Configure the virtual server to use SNAT.
• C.Modify the monitor of the pool.
• D.Edit the packet filter rules.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *